tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post7847469345381777498..comments2024-03-28T22:57:07.128-04:00Comments on ILLUSTRATION ART: WHAT PATTERNS ARE FORDavid Apatoffhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11293486149879229016noreply@blogger.comBlogger252125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-63796415165658776052013-11-07T04:52:10.214-05:002013-11-07T04:52:10.214-05:00Sarah Leon-- Thank you for your very kind comment....Sarah Leon-- Thank you for your very kind comment. I truly appreciate it.David Apatoffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11293486149879229016noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-36995899424128184242013-11-06T17:47:01.298-05:002013-11-06T17:47:01.298-05:00Thanks for your writing. I treasure itThanks for your writing. I treasure itSarah Leonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00324273132023746818noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-72005816448264612462013-10-07T06:36:27.877-04:002013-10-07T06:36:27.877-04:00Heh, touché.
I fully accept that point (don't...Heh, touché.<br /><br />I fully accept that point (don't even have to follow the link, you are right). <br /><br />I was coming back here right now because I wanted to say that I botched the part of the comment where I threw in Sinead in the bag of the "prudes". She's not one of those. In fact I take back all that I posted about Sinead, because I casually fell into the mistake that I was pointing out - that of trying to read too much into a person (even if I did place it as supposition) from my own limited viewpoint. I didn't have to do that to make my point, and I shouldn't have done it. It nagged me as soon as I posted it. She's too interesting a character for me to do that. She has her issues, but "prude" is simply the wrong word. I deserve a lashing for that just as much as she did for her own open letter, so I'm sorry.<br /><br />I keep the rest, though: her reading of the matter comes from a very specific viewpoint, and she makes no allowance for the possibility that other people feel differently from her about these issues, naturally and without being coerced or being anti-feminist. There are many ways of *not* being a prude, and some of them don't deal well with each other.<br /><br />Basically I think Amanda Palmer said exactly what I wanted to say, in the link I mentioned before, and far better than I apparently could.<br /><br /><br />António Araújohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03059765930331992020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-39625122342377419752013-10-07T00:56:12.198-04:002013-10-07T00:56:12.198-04:00Antonio
http://www.queerty.com/sinead-oconnor-now...Antonio<br /><br />http://www.queerty.com/sinead-oconnor-now-accepting-applicants-for-anal-sex-20110830/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-29474416386106375092013-10-04T08:26:19.672-04:002013-10-04T08:26:19.672-04:00By the way, Miley's own rather angry response ...By the way, Miley's own rather angry response to Sinnead should provide more circumstancial evidence to how much she is being vetted by management. My guess, for whatever it's worth, would be...not so much.<br /><br /> António Araújohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03059765930331992020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-26772979132819328612013-10-04T08:09:06.119-04:002013-10-04T08:09:06.119-04:00"(Sinnead) told the presenter, Gay Byrne, tha..."(Sinnead) told the presenter, Gay Byrne, that had she not been a singer, she would have wished to have been a Catholic priest"<br /><br />Yep she would (actually she has been ordained one. Sort of. It's complicated. See wikipedia). Her letter fully qualifies her for that. :p<br /><br />Sinnead O'Connor is a deeply troubed Irish woman ("Irish" meaning hounded by Catholicism since birth - see James Joyce), very religious in her own way, and with a very complicated and unfortunate set of sexual issues. <br /><br />Meaning, her view comes from a very particular position. That doesn't in any way make them invalid, except... where she makes assumptions about other peoples personalities *and* takes those assumptions for facts. Again, people with a conservative way of seeing sexuality seem unable to understand that *other people*, just as healthy or sick as them, may have other views and feelings about these things. I personally feel that sexually conservative people are scary crazy, but I understand that these are just feelings, and just a matter of personality (and culture, ok) and their views are just as "natural" for them as mine are for me. The reverse acknowledgement seems to come harder to the "prudes", who, from the height of their majority position, enjoy calling "perverts" names, having recently lost much of the power to burn them at the actual stake or "normalizing" them.<br /><br />Anyway, I'll see your O'Connor and raise you an Amanda Palmer:<br /><br />http://amandapalmer.tumblr.com/post/63011904833/oltosoc<br /><br />an open letter to sinead o’connor, re: miley cyrus.<br />"<br />(...)<br />Here’s where I think you’re off target. Miley is, from what I can gather, in charge of her own show. She’s writing the plot and signing the checks, and although I think it’s tempting to imagine her in the board room of label assholes and management, I don’t think any of them masterminded her current plan to be a raging, naked, twerking sexpot. I think that’s All Miley All The Way. Now, would these men ARGUE with her when she comes into the room and throws down her treatment to hop up naked on the proverbial (and literal) wrecking ball? Of course not. Sex sells. We all know it. Miley knows it better than anyone: swinging naked on a big metal ball simply gets you more hits than swinging on a big metal ball wearing clothes. We’re mammals. LOOK BOOBS! And even more tantalizing: LOOK HANNAH MONTANA BOOBS! But none of this means that Miley is following anyone else’s script. In fact, what I see is Miley desperately trying to write her own script; truly trying to be taken seriously (even if its in a nakedly playful way) by the standards of her own peers.(...) <br />"<br /><br />António Araújohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03059765930331992020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-12360335749870341052013-10-03T09:08:03.221-04:002013-10-03T09:08:03.221-04:00Miley Cyrus says her naked wrecking ball was inspi...Miley Cyrus says her naked wrecking ball was inspired by Sinead O'Conner. Sinead wrote back "I am extremely concerned for you that those around you have led you to believe, or encouraged you in your own belief, that it is in any way 'cool' to be naked and licking sledgehammers in your videos," Sinèad wrote. "It is in fact the case that you will obscure your talent by allowing yourself to be pimped, whether it's the music business or yourself doing the pimping."<br /><br />"The music business doesn't give a sh*t about you, or any of us," she continues. "They will prostitute you for all you are worth, and cleverly make you think its what YOU wanted... and when you end up in rehab as a result of being prostituted, 'they' will be sunning themselves on their yachts in Antigua, which they bought by selling your body and you will find yourself very alone."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-77831570220332862322013-09-23T20:59:06.079-04:002013-09-23T20:59:06.079-04:00Anonymous,
very well, I apologize for breaking yo...Anonymous,<br /><br />very well, I apologize for breaking your sphincter in two. I zigged when I meant to zag.<br /><br />Dude, you trolls are slippery and then accidents happen. Please get better soon.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />António Araújohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03059765930331992020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-81898841365246664372013-09-23T20:28:03.661-04:002013-09-23T20:28:03.661-04:00Sean,
you left me with a lot of interesting point...Sean,<br /><br />you left me with a lot of interesting points there to consider. With the earlier part I readily agree, the latter I am not sure I am parsing correctly. I need some time, and I am swamped in work. I'll try to get back to you in two or three days.<br /><br />Thank you for your thoughtful post.<br /><br /><br /><br />António Araújohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03059765930331992020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-78321715431661256762013-09-23T20:17:25.470-04:002013-09-23T20:17:25.470-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.António Araújohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03059765930331992020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-47878961534728662032013-09-23T04:00:36.920-04:002013-09-23T04:00:36.920-04:00Men like to date much younger girls because they a...Men like to date much younger girls because they are easier to take advantage of. Women your own age are too smart to be victims. We know its not fun joke to have your ass torn in two. Antonio is an asshole.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-51664705571012570122013-09-22T21:51:28.797-04:002013-09-22T21:51:28.797-04:00Antonio,
I'm not referring to age as definin...Antonio, <br /> I'm not referring to age as defining adulthood, but when one is called to love a wreck of a situation, even though it may not return much. When one is called to love and begins loving human brokenness, then there is certainly something of adulthood.<br /><br />Put another way, loving a family member with Alzheimer's is more heroic and a greater sacrifice than accumulating knowledge and experiences agreeable to the senses. For such reasons, Eros doesn't match Agape in merit or beauty, though it can be overwhelming in its power to absorb one.<br /><br />The Greeks contemplated art, beauty and the virtues and in so doing experienced the logos, that is, in contemplating the virtues, they experienced the subject itself as possessing a character, a disposition which may change with the subject, thus defining it as a certain kind of otherness. Plato was certainly after the virtues as a higher or perfect realm.<br /><br />As the Greeks were introduced to the concept of perfect mercy, perfect forgiveness, perfect love, etc., it was agreeable to them because the perfect virtues were the characteristics belonging to one who described himself as the alpha and omega, the logos, language they understood. There is continuity in what the Ancient Greeks were doing and what the early monastic Greeks of the first century were doing as they were contemplating the same virtues as part of a greater beauty.<br /><br />If this is acceptable, then it stands to reason that, at its best, what took place over the next 1,600 to 2,000 years was at least in continuity with the ancient Greeks in regards to the virtues. The stiff art of the icon which reflected the piety of the contemplatives, changed after the schism around 1,000 leading to developments in drawing painting, etc.<br /><br />Anyone today, contemplating upon the virtues, will experience an interior beauty not unlike that which the Ancient Greeks experienced because it is the nature of the contemplation, the virtue itself. On this blog, some have expressed an interest in truth in art as merit and meaning. Though it might be through a lens of 19th century thinkers who denied the logos, it is certainly not without its meditative and thus religious origins even if no longer recognized.<br /><br /><br />Sean Farrellnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-30627650310592977062013-09-22T05:44:40.017-04:002013-09-22T05:44:40.017-04:00ps: I don't mean to take the dopamine thing to...ps: I don't mean to take the dopamine thing too far either. I realize it is just *one* factor among others. <br /><br />But it is a physical thing you can grab on to in order to come up with rather interesting though very tentative hypothesis.<br /><br />António Araújohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03059765930331992020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-66208973054101639972013-09-22T05:38:02.365-04:002013-09-22T05:38:02.365-04:00>adult
What is an adult? There are certainly &...>adult<br /><br />What is an adult? There are certainly "blurred lines" :). But as a society we decided to make up a magical arbitrary age after which people, for good or ill, are both free to act and responsible for their actions. Some will be too immature at forty and some very wise at 16, but still they are adult at that magical age of 18 (or whatever, depending on country or state). I don't fall for the magical thinking but I fail to see what other solution would work better. People have to be "adults" (i.e., free from both the protection and ownership of parents) at some point.<br /><br />That doesn't mean that in your personal dealings with a particular person you shouldn't make up your own mind as to that person's maturity and act accordingly.<br /><br />>dopamine<br /><br />I didn't mean it as a blanket answer. The fact seems to be that people with more dopamine in their brains will tend to have greater "patternicity", i.e., both a greater tendency to spot true patterns and a greater tendency to fall for "false positives". Conversely, people with less dopamine will tend to miss more true patterns but also will be more resistant to false ones.<br /><br />Among the "patterns" is stuff like dream precognition, conspiracy theories, etc, but also scientific theories. <br /><br />Dopamine rich people in the extreme will see patterns in everything (apophenia) while the dopamine-starved might fall into "randomania" (explaining away as random every "coincidence", no matter how improbable)<br /><br />In particular, dopamine-rich people will tend to be religious. God seems to be the ultimate pattern. <br /><br />This is not explaining things away, it is finding a physical correlate for...personality types if you will. For example, you can do tests in separated twins to see if religiosity (or lack of it) has a genetic component (apparently it does).<br /><br />It does not explain away religiosity, but it leads me to expect little from endless discussions between religious people and atheists. Some of us may change sides through argument, but it is a very, very long shot, and that makes me weary of such discussions unless I am really feeling like arguing a lot. <br /><br />ps: Idealy we should compromise: give our "patternicity" free reign to speculate and then check it against facts and probabilities, except that in most cases probabilities are impossible to calculate and facts are unavailable.<br /><br />In the practice of mathematics this is more feasible than elsewhere, since the second part is usually more doable. Hence, the usual procedure is to feel free to dream up lots of wild conjectures and then to proceed to destroy them one by one as fast as possible until we find a true one. <br /><br />It is actually a sobering thing to notice how many conjectures (patterns) that look promising turn out to be bogus in this process. It leads me (unsurprisingly, being a dopamine-lean guy)to be weary in the cases I cannot check (i.e., when dealing with patterns "in the wild"). It might however lead a dopamine-fat person to instead focus on the fact that all those conjectures were a small number amid the immensity of possible ones and therefore conclude that valid patterns are indeed everywhere :). The problem here is that neither I nor the other person really know how many "reasonable conjectures" we are talking about, and so again we can't really calculate probabilities - so we fall again into reinforcing the preconceptions of our specific patternicity tendencies.<br /><br />The better conclusion might be to identify ourselves as having a tendency to one error or the other and therefore making an effort to play devil's advocate with ourselves often. Or have someone else do it for us. <br /><br />TLDR: A Mulder needs a Scully and vice-versa.António Araújohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03059765930331992020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-55792242125638229902013-09-21T18:37:22.272-04:002013-09-21T18:37:22.272-04:00David,
Yes, there are other experiences that make ...David,<br />Yes, there are other experiences that make up what moves humans in art and I wasn't eliminating them, but are they disinterested?<br /><br />It is very easy to overlook the religious component of seeing because it is so subtle. The Greeks were aware of it as logos, an experience of an otherness<br />and may have had a close association with the search for virtue. It was part of the Manichaeism of Augustine, but so also his conversion and the concept was a huge part of monasticism. In it there is an experience of beauty which comes upon one rather than as self engendered, in a way possibly similar to your experience in the cave. <br /><br />So there is an experience of beauty which is not engendered by oneself, by one's desires and this is the disinterested part; it relates to beauty in which we connect to something else, but not by our own power. The concept is similar in visual art, poetry etc. where the art exudes a life of its own. Something unintended may be experienced from art, just as something unintended may be experienced in meditation, as per the Greeks or in prayer, an otherness. <br /><br /> I also think you are right on in your assessment of Miley, that she was coached to fascinate the prurient desires of a bored but addicted public.<br /><br />Antonio, your explanation of your sex life expresses some serious limitations of what exactly is another adult. Your dopamine explanation is equally a blanket answer to all that calls to curiosity, such as synchronicity, precognitions of a friend about to call and numerous experiences of love such as that described at end of Camus' The Stranger, or what used to be called the Christian existential experience.<br />Sean Farrellnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-59298300454851895002013-09-18T13:24:14.293-04:002013-09-18T13:24:14.293-04:00I also suggest that equating passive anal sex with...I also suggest that equating passive anal sex with a well-endowed partner with a horrible experience like you are doing is a sign of sexual limitation on your part. And maybe a bit of homophobia. <br /><br />Lots of people of both sexes enjoy passive anal. Lots of sexual partners will use aggressive expressions like that *playfully*. Something "big enough to break etc." doesn't mean it will be used to actually break anything. It means it is big enough to hurt you and pleasure you just as much as you may enjoy it. Slaps, dirty talk, a bit of pain, may be enjoyed by both partners. Is this news for anybody out there?<br /><br />I suggest you try having that particular kind of sex (passive or active or both, your choice) with a partner who isn't a prude, and then report back on what kind of statements were vocalized in the heat of the moment. I'm sure it would all be appropriate for a church gathering.<br />António Araújohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03059765930331992020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-5165130570427521262013-09-18T12:47:46.914-04:002013-09-18T12:47:46.914-04:00I suggest you have no sense of humour or notion of...I suggest you have no sense of humour or notion of context and must be a real riot in bed.<br /><br />António Araújohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03059765930331992020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-5794800550537297622013-09-17T01:06:08.168-04:002013-09-17T01:06:08.168-04:00The words to robin Thicke's song that Miley Cy...The words to robin Thicke's song that Miley Cyrus danced to go<br /><br />Yeah, I had a bitch, but she ain't bad as you<br />So hit me up when you passing through<br />I'll give you something big enough to tear your ass in two<br />Nothing like your last guy, he too square for you<br />He don't smack that ass and pull your hair like that<br />Do it like it hurt, like it hurt<br />What you don't like work?<br /><br />Antonio says these are a sexy young girl's wants I hope someone tears his ass in two see how he likes it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-50989024548380625662013-09-13T05:21:45.103-04:002013-09-13T05:21:45.103-04:00MORAN,
I won't go on. You aren't even mak...MORAN,<br /><br />I won't go on. You aren't even making an effort at an argument. You just keep making ugly assumptions about someone you don't know. That is a mark of the prejudiced and the closed-minded. <br /><br />The fact that I don't conform to your provincial model can't even enter your mind. Try meeting people who are different from you. People who aren't careerists or capitalists or corporate climbers who impress girls with their cars and bank accounts. Go out and make an effort to meet people out of your usual crowd. Perhaps you'll finally meet women who don't feel a need to "fake their orgasms" (perhaps because their men don't go grimly at it as if they had a duty to reach a goal every time - if you sport-fans would drop the "getting to nth-base" analogies you'd do better - girls fake it because their are tired of you asking if they got there; when they do, you'll notice)<br /><br />BTW, I'll "stick to" whatever I want, and it wasn't I who brought up the subject of sex. I didn't realize that some rule implied that we all had to agree with whatever slut-shaming ageist premise was offered.<br /><br />And at least I offered more than your vile one-liner provocations.António Araújohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03059765930331992020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-81323379043328983002013-09-13T00:04:04.059-04:002013-09-13T00:04:04.059-04:00Antonio stick to riffing about art not telling us ...Antonio stick to riffing about art not telling us why your afraid to date women your age. Young girls impress easy because they haven't heard your tricks before. Women with your same experience know what you are.MORANnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-1855298583356014642013-09-12T15:19:11.825-04:002013-09-12T15:19:11.825-04:00I look at Miley's video and I think that maybe...<br />I look at Miley's video and I think that maybe she is like that. Maybe I'm wrong. But unless we call her up, who are you to know? Perhaps she is a prude being exploited. Or perhaps she is like me. If I was a woman and had her body, hell yeah I'd be riding wrecking balls like a damned goddess and be payed for it. Some people's horror are another's fun.<br /><br />Hey, Courtney Love agrees with me (now I have a scholar on my side :p):<br /><br />http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/11/courtney-love-miley-cyrus-hillbilly_n_3908222.html?ref=topbar<br /><br />That's exactly what I said: Miley has a weird (pop-ish )punk vibe. A punk may be sexually aggressive in a way that you interpret as being objectified but she (and I) interprets as liberating. Liberating from what? from the preconceptions of prudish people like you, who cannot imagine that a 30-something might go out on a date with a 20-something without having monetary control over her.<br /><br />>That girl giving free blowjobs in >public at the Slane concert is >just doing what you said.<br /><br />I don't even get this reference.<br /><br />> Your afraid to chase mature women >your own age who are your equals.<br /><br />Are you sure, Dr freud? My previous relations with girls my own age and who are my superiors in several ways (intellectually for one) would seem to disprove that, but since you don't care to know anything about me before throwing out the vilest things, why should you care?<br /><br />Try not to be a hypocrite. As you got older, did you start finding 20-somethings unnatractive? Do you go out *only* with girls your age because you are afraid of rejection?<br /><br />I am against ageism, which by the way is a form of discrimination, that doesn't mean I can't appreciate older women, it just means I don't place an arbitrary barrier between me and younger, legal age women who might find me interesting.<br /><br />It also means I don't fear rejection. I never was a hunk, so I got used to it early. Here's the thing: if you like a girl, you let her know. I don't care how old or young she is, apart from the legal limit. If I like her, I let her know, and it is up to her. If she thinks I am too old or too young, or too thin, or too short, she will tell me. <br /><br />It is for her to decide what is appropriate for her. Not you nor your ageist or sexual prejudices. Try that as a definition of respect for women.António Araújohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03059765930331992020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-8934786881667083992013-09-12T15:18:56.445-04:002013-09-12T15:18:56.445-04:00>Antonio its easy to take advantage >of girl...>Antonio its easy to take advantage >of girl students who are much >younger and in lower jobs isn't it? <br /><br />Wow. You are one negative individual. None of that applies. I would have to be an idiot to chase students, out of all women available. Is that what you do, meet people at the job? Don't you ever go out and meet people you don't know? Talk to a stranger? Also, I don't pull out my wallet or my credentials when I meet a girl in a party, do you? <br /><br />You are assuming a lot, and item by item you are wrong. It is unkind to assume the worse about people who you don't know and who aren't writing under assumed names.<br /><br />I never attracted anyone by my "status" or "money" or "job" because I have lived my life with utter contempt for those things that maybe you think are so attractive. My car is old as shit, my (mortgaged) house is a mess and my clothes are cheap. I crap on power. If a woman falls for me it's because she likes me. If she likes anything else it is either my drawings or my books, 'cause I have nothing else material to offer, nor will ever. <br /><br />Guess what, maybe they like me cause I treat them really well - which I do - and also I appreciate them for sexual beings. That doesn't mean I'm bragging about sexual performance, much less about my average looks, it means I really like a woman's body and traits and that includes all the funky details like her swollen face in the morning and her period and the sound and smell of her pissing and her moods and her occasional bouts with candida. Maybe it's because virtually all my ex-s are my close friends. Maybe it's because almost all my close friends are actual women that I can talk about them without confusing respect for a fear of sex.<br /><br />which is what you are doing. Let me put it very simply. You are being prudish. You are trying to be respectful of women but you are merely mischaracterizing a woman's wants and her rather savage sexual nature.<br /><br />Ok, not all women are like that. Some women think like you. Many do, in fact. Here's the thing: I don't pursue women who don't have a sexual nature that is compatible with mine. I don't chase or beg or cajole. I just look for the women that are like me: people with a healthy sex drive and no bullshit - catholic, prudish, whatever - on their minds. If I had to explain things to a woman like I am having to explain things to you, I would simply not go for that woman. <br /><br />Not all people are the same, not all are like you. Some of us see sex in a different way. Some girls - which I know intimately and therefore can speak of - watch thicke's video and get horny and prance around mimicking the moves and having fun and feeling sexy. These are not stupid girls, nor are they socially submissive. They are smart girls. They are just not sexually repressed. They aren't prudes like you are. And I don't mean this as an insult. People are different.<br /><br />(cont.)<br />António Araújohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03059765930331992020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-64938387658991553962013-09-12T09:37:32.574-04:002013-09-12T09:37:32.574-04:00Antonio its easy to take advantage of girl student...Antonio its easy to take advantage of girl students who are much younger and in lower jobs isn't it? That girl giving free blowjobs in public at the Slane concert is just doing what you said. Your afraid to chase mature women your own age who are your equals.MORANnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-22588611722583754992013-09-11T18:31:04.964-04:002013-09-11T18:31:04.964-04:00Twerking like it's 1910 :)
https://www.youtub...Twerking like it's 1910 :)<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=criEcLXgUQ0António Araújohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03059765930331992020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12189014.post-42710327047545519142013-09-11T18:02:23.351-04:002013-09-11T18:02:23.351-04:00It's complicated:
http://www.youtube.com/watc...It's complicated:<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOY3QH_jOtE<br /><br />Meaning, it is not well captured by pieties.<br /><br />António Araújohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03059765930331992020noreply@blogger.com