The last post suggested that when it comes to depicting a plague, a literal, realistic approach usually falls short. The examples I posted, and the better examples suggested by commenters, suggested that mere accuracy is not the best tool for a topic such as this.
As one commenter suggested, imaginative symbolism seems better suited:
Edgar Allen Poe's Masque of the Red Death provided ample inspiration for illustrators such as Harry Clarke to anthropomorphize the concept of death:
The talented John Hendrix also used pen and ink, but with touches of color, to create this different and interesting approach:
Note how Hendrix enhances his symbols with words...
The pride of man coming to naught |
I've often criticized today's illustrators who resort to words because they are incapable of drawing. In my view, Hendrix is an illustrator who gets it right. His words aren't a crutch, they are an enhancement. They don't make his pictures more literal, they add an element of mystery and obscurity.
In the following illustration of the plague in Manchuria for a 1911 cover of Petit Journal, the inclusion of a lot of unnecessary details (such as folds in clothing and rocks on the ground) distracts from what might otherwise have been a dramatic image of the plague personified:
Arnold Bocklin had a better sense of priorities. With fewer details and less precision, his vision of the plague nevertheless seems more creepy and chilling :
But when it comes to anthropomorphized death, few can compete with the famous Triumph of Death by Pieter Bruegel the Elder, who lived through the black plague in the 16th century.