At the start of the 20th century, artists and designers were excited by the prospect of a new era filled with miraculous inventions such as telephones and cars. Science promised a world where humans could begin to create their own environment. But artists with vision recognized that there was also a danger: a man-made world could easily devolve into an industrial wasteland of purely functional objects unless artists were up to the task of creating new designs and forms suited for the machine age. Only designers could preserve beauty in an era when industrialization and mass production began to replace nature. Perhaps the greatest visionary of this period was Peter Behrens, an illustrator for the magazine Jugend, as well as a designer, architect, typographer, teacher and author. He has been called "the first industrial designer."
Behrens designed buildings, stationery, electrical appliances, silverware, typefaces, furniture and environments. He served as the design advisor to one of the world's largest manufacturing concerns, helped to found the German Association of Craftsmen and taught classes that would later become the conceptual underpinning for the Bauhaus. Most of all, he nurtured young apprentices who went on to become the titans of modern design, including Mies van der Rohe, Gropius and Le Corbusier. Behrens said he designed for the modern world by returning to "the fundamental principles of all form creating work."
Behrens also designed several typefaces that became standards for the 20th century.
When designing type, he compared the process of the human eye reading text to
watching a bird's flight or the gallop of a horse. Both seem graceful and pleasing. But the viewer does not observe details of their form or movement. Only the rhythm of the lines is seen by the viewer, and the same is true of a typeface.We all owe a debt to Behrens for helping to preserve a place for design in the human enterprise during the machine age.
But now the 20th century is over. Today's artists and designers face the new challenges of the 21st century. Who will be the new Peter Behrens who develops an aesthetic for the information age?
Information technology has deluged us with more data than we can assimilate-- a capability so dazzling that information has supplanted the role of wisdom or knowledge. As Karrie Jacobs noted,
Computers have seduced us into thinking about ideas-- the intangible stuff that comprises our culture, our mental universe, our homegrown organic realities-- as information. Information has become the end product, rather than the means to achieve that end.Just as Information can overwhelm our ability to convert data into knowledge, it can overwhelm our ability to process sensory input in aesthetic form. Information streams are added one on top of the other, like ornaments on a Christmas tree.
The typical modern TV screen has a "crawl" with a message along the bottom, a "bug" identifying the station in the lower corner, and pop ups announcing the weather or the next show or the late breaking news. Anyone who has witnessed a message promoting the Gilmore Girls superimposed on the closing poignant moments of The Godfather knows that the domain of aesthetics has been overwhelmed by information. The same could be said of the cacophony of gateways to databases on websites, or even the designs appearing in many magazines. They are not integrated into our lives in an organic or intuitive way.
For those artists who feel that the glory days of art and design are behind us, here is a challenge: whoever finds the artistic vision to apply "the fundamental principles of all form creating work" to the new information age will earn our undying gratitude.
A fascinating post, David - once again, I've learned something I should have learned years ago in art school, but didn't - how could that be possible? Thanks for being here to enlighten me!
ReplyDeleteOn the topic of today's sensory overload and to that imaginary saviour who will lead us out of the wasteland of visual clutter: I recall reading that scientists researching brain wave patterns have been astonished to see new, never before recorded synapyic path choices in the brains of children born after the internet revolution. Something to the effect of, throughout the history of mankind, the development of logic and reason has meant that we fire our synapses in relation to this type of pattern:
a,b,c,d... "e" must be next or
1,2,3,4,... "5" must be next
But Post-internet children are able to arrive at the same conclusion in this manner:
green,14,bird,music,..."e" or "5" must be next!
Bizarre, but there it is.
So perhaps this visual messiah who makes sense of the information age won't save us "old-timers" at all, because (s)he will be of the first generation to find the technological world an entirely comfortable place by virtue of having emerged from its womb. Our old fashioned brains, hard wired to organize in an old fashioned way simply won't be able to relate.
"green,14,bird,music,..."e" or "5" must be next!"
ReplyDeleteThat is preposterous. It is so obvious that "elevator" or "door" must be next.
Leif, old timers like you and I can take some solace from the fact that the human brain has been anatomically stable for the past 100,000 years. To the extent our mode of thinking is evolving, it may be because nature gifted us with an organ so advanced that we have only been able to figure out how to use a small percentage of it. We seem to be the only example in nature where a species has been given a luxury organ far exceeding its current needs and abilities. I suspect that over the next millenium, we'll find a lot more rattling around in there besides green, bird and music.
ReplyDelete"green,14,bird,music,..."e" or "5" must be next!"
ReplyDeleteIt's sad that I spent more than 5 minutes trying to figure out the pattern to this.
I believe "letter" is actually next.
(As always, love the article - makes me think far too hard.)
Where can I learn about Behrens' "fundamental principals of form creating work." When I search him I am only coming up with lots of bio data. I would like to hear his pitch for these fundamentals. Sounds very compelling.
ReplyDelete