There's a lot going on in J.C. Coll's little drawing of a sword fight by a stranded stage coach.
Hidden away in the back, behind the door of the coach, is another swordsman, this one a buffoon who couldn't quite make it out of the coach to defend the fair maiden. (In the shadows we can just make out his hand fumbling the sword and his feet slipping out from under him.)
If you saw this illustration in a magazine today, who would even notice the small figure behind the door? It's debatable whether a narrative this complex even needed another figure.
My point today is that this drawing was done in a very different era for a very different kind of audience, an audience that had time to linger over subtle details and get pleasure from small, hidden elements and surprises. An audience without a computer or television competing for its attention, an audience that was not skimming over dozens of images, often in thumbnail sized icons. That difference has a major impact on the incentives for the artist and the reaction of the audience.
Beautiful drawing, yes! Love the inch-high face. However the way I read it the unseen swordsman is falling backward, losing his sword, because he was just slashed by the sword of the central figure.
ReplyDeleteYou make an excellent point about audiences and appreciation. There are still those of us out here who are desperate for the chance to linger... there's just no money on it. I suppose there never was for most artists. I wonder if this artist had his living taken care of...
ReplyDeleteHe did this in a wild heat, the whole thing handwritten at an arm's length, and meant to coalesce thereabouts, like he was dashing off a letter rather than a work of art. His marks veer between virtuosity and impatience.
ReplyDeleteArthur I. Keller did similarly expressive figures, but they always seem to call attention to themselves. Coll's stuff is fully integrated into a drama through his roguish dramatic sensibility.
His sparkling and masculine American style, noir lighting, pen hatching, and rugged sinewy-expressive figures set the pace for so many others to come, from Godwin and Flanagan to Sickles and Dorne to Davis and Frazetta to Wrightson and Kaluta to Sienkiewicz and Gianni.
I agree. Coll was awesome.
ReplyDeleteThanks for posting this David and love the H G Wellsian title for this post. I've always had a soft spot for Coll's work and this is a lovely example - the vignette aspect gives it the feel of a snowball hitting its mark.
ReplyDeleteThe above post was by yours truly.
ReplyDeleteIt gladdens my heart to see that there are still JC Coll fans out there. It's amazing that he accomplished what he did before he died at age 41. His contemporary, Frederic Gruger, lived another 30 years and was highly productive while technological developments improved the quality of his reproductions and enabled him to do some very nice color work. Coll's great talent missed out on all of that, but he sure made the best use of the time he had.
ReplyDeleteIt looks to me like the lead swordsman has pushed the guy behind the door into the carriage in order to momentarily incapacitate him so he can attack the other assailants. (Amazing how small he worked. He must have had good eyesight.)
ReplyDeleteI like how he gets bumps into the ground to pose his figures on and cast shadows. The carriage wheels sink in. A lot of artists don't think about that and make the ground flat and boring.
~ FV
FV, that's a good point about the ground. With great artists everything plays into the theme - a total, coherent little world.
ReplyDelete