Saturday, June 03, 2006

PAINTING WATER: THE MARRIAGE OF FREEDOM AND CONTROL



Sometimes it takes the greatest amount of self-discipline to capture the things that are most free and elusive. You might think that painting water-- that most fluid, shimmering substance-- would permit an illustrator to indulge in the wildest excesses. But I was surprised to discover that some of the painters who are best at capturing the freedom of water can only do so using the most exacting self-discipline and control. (There's probably a metaphor for life in there somewhere.)




Stanley Meltzoff, whose spectacular paintings are featured in this and my previous post, described to me a similar process for painting water:

So far as I can tell depicting water depends on following the complex rules of illumination, refraction, reflection, color absorption, distortions of all these by the shape of the waves and the color of the bottom and supended particles, all in perspective. There are now computer dependent rules for depicting water in different wave shapes and lighting used by animators in making special effects. The instructions in computer language are beyond my understanding, but available. The How To books in art stores have simpler sets of instructions for painting water which, even if incomplete, are illuminating. So are the comments of John Ruskin in Stones of Venice, and even Gombrich in Art and Illusion. Current water painters do better analysing photographs and reconstructing the fluids in accord with the rules for making illusion, once they have spent some time looking at that particular structure of fluids in motion. I suppose mystics can do this by prayer or meditation, but the picture makers I am acquainted with are practical craftsmen, among whom there are some who can tell a story better than others. I suppose Moses could make water flow from a rock, but Meltzoff needs to use paint on gesso panels to create the illusion of water and wetness for others to contemplate.



Meltzoff went on to talk about the differences between capturing the world above water and the world underwater:

Let me say that painting underwater light and space involve more and other optical rules than water seen from above. The source of light is from above through the water surface. It is as if the waves seen from above were emiting light from beneath . The undersurface reflects in more complex ways than the surface above. Moreover the light is not in a continuous flow as in daylight, but is in distinct bands of focused light surrounded by large volumes of diminished and unfocussed light, in motion and overlapping. Atmospheric perspective and color absorption are more varied and affect varying wave lengths according to the optical processes and physics of water rather than those in air. The movement of bands of light underwater is quite unlike anything above water. With the exception of the undersurface and the bottom when visible, the rules of vanishing point perspective in air are useless underwater, except for single objects. It is not at all like painting en plein air. The same is true for the effect of gravity on vertical and horizontal structures which is so marked above water and clearly seen in vanishing point perspective.



Reflecting on Meltzoff's approach, I was struck by how hard he works to convey an evanescent, shimmering freedom and how successful he is at doing so. It shows how much you can achieve at the intersection where freedom and control come together. 

4 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I once received as a birthday gift, a water color of two Koi. It was the most beautiful painting I had ever held in my hands. The artist was not well know. He was a New England sombody who's art happened to be for sale at the local Leverett Arts and Crafts near my mother's home. I was delighted to have it. Being afraid to lose it, I carried it on board the airplane rather than checking it as my mother suggested. Tending to a very cranky, hungry and uncomfortable 1 1/2 year old, who had an ear infection, as well as carrying the acoutremont of a new mom, led me to abandon the painting in the overhead bin. I was heart broken, and sure I would never be a normal adult person with a brain again.

This gentleman is not the artist, but captures some of what I saw:
http://www.rjconway.com/ppage9.html

6/25/2006 8:56 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

sorry, correction of typo: "known"
and a signature - cp

6/25/2006 8:57 PM  
Anonymous MORAN said...

Meltzoff is a genius at painting water-- he has obviously thought about it long and hard. Thanks for sharing his insights.

4/01/2010 3:58 PM  
Blogger Sam Johnson said...

He was having extraordinary talent in his paintings work.Thanks for sharing with us Paintings for Sale

3/09/2011 2:46 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home