Wednesday, June 24, 2026

TRIBUTE TO AN ILLUSTRATED BOOK, part 2


Lynd Ward's 1929 book, God's Man, came out at the wrong time and place. 


At a time when full color reproductions on glossy pages in books and magazines were new and wildly popular, God's Man was made exclusively of black and white woodcuts, a medium that predated Durer in the 15th century. 

In a decade when the country was celebrating prosperity and citizens were wallowing in new luxuries and  promiscuity, God's Man was an unwelcome admonition about selling your soul for material gain and the pleasures of the flesh. 

Lynd Ward made his powerful book, consisting of 139 woodcuts-- no words-- when he was 23.  He had just returned from training at the State Academy for Graphic Arts in Leipzig Germany.  There, he developed  an appreciation for German expressionist graphics and he brought that aesthetic back to the US in this remarkable book.



Shortly after Ward's book was published, the stock market crashed, hurling the world into the Great Depression.  This caused many to reflect on the excesses of the "roaring twenties" with a different perspective.

Whatever the reason, Ward's book beat the odds and became famous.  It made his reputation as an illustrator and it encouraged successive generations of artists to experiment in similar ways.  It was reprinted several times,  although the recent paperback reproductions have none of the charm of the original book, which was beautifully printed on thick paper.

Living in an era of digital art and AI, it's easy to conclude that this is not the right time or place to attempt certain kinds of artistic efforts.  But Lynd Ward had strong artistic views and was rewarded for taking chances.

 

Tuesday, June 16, 2026

WHAT REMAINS AFTER THE 4TH GREAT HUMILIATION?


Done with Chat GPT in 2 minutes

Freud famously claimed that the human race has suffered three great humiliations:

  • The discovery by Copernicus that earth isn't the center of the universe, "only a tiny fragment of a cosmic system of scarcely imaginable vastness." Astronomy destroyed our illusion of a safe and stable home at the hub of the universe and left us in an unbounded, decentralized universe where even basic directions such as "up and down" no longer had absolute meaning.  It was the beginning of centuries of warfare between science and religions.  
  • The discovery that humans evolved from primitive primates rather than originating in a divinely appointed spot at the top of creation.  The discovery that our fossil trail led not from the Garden of Eden but from a frightened cynodont hiding in the mud rattled faith in humanity's special protected status.  The cultural battles from this humiliation continue to rage today in legal, educational and scientific circles.
  • The discovery that humans aren't intrinsically rational beings but instead are heavily influenced by the irrational activity of our subconscious minds.  Psychological sciences shed new light on human nature, transforming our notions of free will, motivation, guilt, identity, responsibility and more.  Based on these discoveries, laws have been rewritten.  Educational practices have changed.  Novels, plays and later movies were written around the new understandings. 

Years ago I asked on this blog whether AI might become the source of our fourth great humiliation, resulting in comparable social and cultural upheaval.  

It's not too soon to conclude that the answer is "yes."  Our status as creators has long been viewed as central to the glory of being human.  If art becomes a fast, cheap and effortless commodity created by machine, it would be another great blow to human dignity and worth.  

So the question for discussion is: what's a suitable artistic response to this fourth humiliation?

During the lifetime of Copernicus, artists used allegorical representations of high concepts to deal with big issues.  For example, today's artists might look to Mattias Gerung's 1544 The Baptism of the Antichrist:  

From left to right: NVIDIA, Anthropic, OpenAI, and Meta AI

Wry humor is always a good bet, even on the gallows.  Here is how the prophetic Carter Goodrich welcomed in the new millennium:



Then there's the juvenile response: a "Fuck AI" tee shirt.  I doubt any long term satisfaction can come from this approach. 




One of the most interesting creative struggles about the battle between man and machine is Phil Hale's series of paintings of Johnny Badhair.  Hale painted more than eighty paintings of a ballet between a solitary, half dressed figure and a machine in front of a universal blue sky.  Hale's machines were a sinister metallic conglomeration of sprockets, blades and cables-- an excellent visual representation of John Henry's steam drill, or of AI. 

Each new painting in this series became a fresh experiment with an uncertain outcome.  The paintings are powerful, even savage, and yet at the same time they are riddled with ambiguity; sometimes it seems one combatant has won, but that lasts only as long as the next painting.  It's never too clear what they're battling for or who the victor will be.



I wrote an essay for Hale's 2016 book, Let's Kill Johnny Badhair, in which I quote from Peter Viereck's prescient 1947 poem, Prince Tank
During the fourth and fifth world wars, the tanks
Will still obey, still seem to serve their humans...
 The sixth war they will serve more sullenly--
And suddenly will know their day has come.
The birthday of the Prince of all the tanks.

And then will humans all be jitterbugs,
Migrate like locusts from their dance-hall doors,
And sing with insect-voices metal shrill:
"Our god is born!" and roll to him like grapes
Till all their frenzy begs his metal treads:
"Love us to death, love us to death" the day
Creation's final goal, Prince Tank, is born.
These are all possible artistic responses to the fourth humiliation.   None of them so far will be enough to, in the words of Flaubert, "move the stars to pity" us for our situation.  We won't get off that easily.  But at least it's a place to start thinking.


Monday, June 08, 2026

ART FROM THE COMPOST HEAP


"See what forest has arisen from the rot."  -- Susan Barba

The Roman Colosseum was designed for the most brutal entertainments. 


Ancient Romans were thrilled to see victims ripped to shreds by lions and tigers.  The more fortunate victims were permitted to fight back (damnatio ad bestias or "condemnation to beasts").  The less fortunate were 
left naked and defenseless to be devoured (obicĕre bestiis or "to throw to beasts").

Centuries later, stones from the blood soaked Colosseum were taken down, polished, and used to build the beautiful Basilica of St. Peter:


But the corkscrew had one more twist: in order to raise money to build the Basilica, the church sold forgiveness to sinners.  Martin Luther, in his Ninety-Five Theses, blasted the church for selling "indulgences" enabling sinners to buy their way into heaven. 

That's the way the world goes. Again and again, terrible things somehow morph into things pure and beautiful.

For centuries, sugarcane plantations were among the worst abusers of slave labor.  Artist James Gillray drew the mistreated slaves who were forced to cut and press sugarcane in deadly heat, then boil the crop in hellish furnaces (below left).  Many perished in the process. The result: delightfully sweet sugar. 



Commenters on this blog have decried the disintegration of our culture.  The fine arts have become puerile and decadent; standards have declined; the absence of boundaries has rendered us shapeless;  digital theft, appropriation art, auto-toning and plagiarism run rampant; the odor of postmodern nihilism pervades; economics create all the worst incentives.  

Alarmed voices demand: "once our creative muscles have atrophied, our cognitive functions have diminished, and our taste has been softened by subjectivity, how can we ever go back?  How can standards regain any authority once they've been trampled?  How can innocence, once lost, be recovered?"

No one can say for sure, but on the subject of hope I often turn to the great Walt Whitman who mused about the purity and renewal of common grass:

O how can it be that the ground itself does not sicken?

Are they not continually putting distemper’d corpses within you?
Is not every continent work'd over and over with sour dead?

Where have you disposed of their carcasses?
Those drunkards and gluttons of so many generations?
Where have you drawn off all the foul liquid and meat?
I do not see any of it upon you to-day...

Behold this compost! behold it well!
Perhaps every mite has once form’d part of a sick person—yet behold!
The grass of spring covers the prairies,

The summer growth is innocent and disdainful above all those strata of sour dead.
....
It grows such sweet things out of such corruptions,
It turns harmless and stainless on its axis, with such endless successions of diseas’d corpses,
It distills such exquisite winds out of such infused fetor,
It renews with such unwitting looks its prodigal, annual, sumptuous crops,
It gives such divine materials to men, and accepts such leavings from them at last.

If there is to be a renewal in the arts, what form will it take? We can't just unlearn what we've learned.  We can't reverse course to Rembrandt or Howard Pyle.  All I can do is direct you-- once again-- to the wisdom of the ancients.  In 700 BC, Archilochus had already discovered that no outcome should be beyond expectations:
Henceforth nothing is certain:
one may expect everything,
and none among you should be astonished to see,
one day, the deer, preferring the sonorous tides of the sea to the land,
borrow from the dolphins their sea pasture,
while the latter plunge into the mountains.