Monday, April 29, 2024

ONE LOVELY DRAWING, part 73

I love Frederic Gruger's drawing of a confrontation between a Russian princess and a group of leering Bolshevik invaders.


Gruger was famous for making paintings using nothing but a Wolff pencil, cheap cardboard and spit. (Later, he upgraded from spit to water and when he really began making money he added watercolor  wash accents.)

Gruger's illustrations were striking for his ability to achieve rich velvety tones, but he also knew how to draw with a pencil point:



Gruger expertly staged his picture with details and lighting.  Here is an artist who was firmly in control of the room.


But the feature I'd like to point out today is the faces of the mob in the background (reproduced here several times larger than the originals).

In the 1920s, without the benefit of the internet, Gruger captured the ruddy smiles of Eurasian peasants


             


Each of these ruffians in the front row has a distinctive face, but note that as the faces get further into the background they dissipate into abstraction.  They become shapes in a composition.



The painting on the wall in the background is another example-- rather than draw a representational image, Gruger blurs it into abstraction (with nice strong compositional shapes). 


Gruger's prioritization of elements is part of what holds this picture together so tightly, and makes Gruger an artist, not just a draftsman.


19 comments:

Al McLuckie said...

When I look at work like this , or any number of artists , Brandywine Pyle etc, I wonder how in Hell did they reach that level ? Less distractions ? Better instruction ? Did they simply work that much harder ?

Al McLuckie

nodnarB said...

I love how much character Gruger was able to get In these figures.

chris bennett said...

Wow David, this drawing is wonderful! Thanks for posting it!

Again, like the Booth and the Flagg the main award for this amazing work go to the quality of composition and the deep complexities embodied therein.

That said, the suppleness and potent evocations realised by the masterful drawing of the elements themselves is a feast within the compositional building. I'm guessing Gruger might have been a big fan of Rembrandt, particularly his etchings.

Anonymous said...

Very like Rembrandt, Chris, and Goya. Another lovely one, David - thanks !

Bill

kev ferrara said...

Gruger ranks up there with all the best. Every figure has life and personality and authenticity, the costuming, furniture and accessories and all on point; tactile yet with breadth and all contributing something, the patterning is lovely, the composition thought through from end to end, there's authentic lighting, space, and atmosphere, the tones are warm, luminous, and velvety. Even the walls have character. All suggested, because if you look in, it all evaporates. He even achieves a sense of local color without using color. A completely joy to witness, appreciate, contemplate, or investigate.

As of this moment, a couple of copies of F.R. Gruger and His Circle are still available on ebay in the $20-30 range. Highly recommended.

MORAN said...

I didn't know his work but he's awesome.

squeen said...

I love Gruger's work. He was reportedly prolific and greatly admired, but I've found only a very small fraction of his work on-line. He doesn't even have a Wikipedia page.

Li-An said...

@squeen : the book about his work is full of great images. You can find more of his illustrations on Today’s Inspiration Facebook group.
David Apatoff shows us beautiful selected images. When you see a bunch of them, sometimes Gruger is not so good :-)

kev ferrara said...

When you see a bunch of them, sometimes Gruger is not so good :-)

I have around 500 unique, individually-saved images in my Gruger folder on my external HD. Looking at his quality and success rate, there are maybe a few dozen artists in history that were as consistently great as he was. Particularly at doing fully composed scenes with specific believable settings, characters, costumes, sets, props, and lighting. He could do posh people in upscale interiors as well as a rough characters in the woods. He could do mystery, action, romance, comedy, crime, war, or historical all with equal merit. He was as good at character as Rockwell, as good at light and shade as Rembrandt, as true-to-life as Von Schmidt, as clever at composition as Pyle, draws as well as Frazetta, Patterns as well as Cornwell (though less conspicuously), and is almost as good at loose-but-accurate execution as Sargent.

It would be one hell of a challenge to overrate him. As it stands, given how few know his work, his name should be sung from the rafters.

chris bennett said...

Blimey Kev, those two images are fantastically good! The horse one is as wonderful as it gets, up there with the very best visual poetry that humanity has ever produced. Thanks for rooting them out.

xopxe said...

Isn't the composition somewhat weird? She is placed in the dead middle, her shoulder in the geometric center of the drawing. The right side is mainly a bed.

chris bennett said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
chris bennett said...

xopxe,

The woman is the flimsy, vulnerable barrier between her world on the right hand side; that of the comfort and luxury of the bed and its embodiment of dreams, refinement, protection and the womb, and that of the the left hand side; the chill of the outside world, the mob, potential chaos, multiplicity and its incumbent threat.

And all this is conveyed by the graphics of the composition operating by purely sensuous means to convey the literary interpretation given above. In other words, compositionally this feeling 'comes at ya' before our intellect identifies what is going on.

kev ferrara said...

Isn't the composition somewhat weird?

If a composition isn't strange to you, it isn't saying something you haven't seen already.

Thanks for rooting them out.

Took as long to copypaste the hypertext code into my post. A minute.

Movieac said...

Searching for more drawings found this video on YouTube Kev and others might find interesting
https://youtu.be/2EI8fk5Zekg?si=VDh2gn2pvyaupUTe

xopxe said...

Ha ha, no, really, the composition is just weird.

kev ferrara said...

"...found this video on YouTube Kev and others might find interesting."

Wow, great find, Movieac. Thank you.

Given Gruger's age throughout, and from the clothes and bobbed haircuts, and because 1923-24 was the time that home movie cameras came of age for wealthy amateurs, I'd guess it was all filmed 1925-28.

chris bennett said...

Hey Movieac, thanks for the Gruger link. Apart from the fascination, it struck me how utterly similar is the way that we film our domestic celebrations - it could have been shot today.

Also nice to hear Barbra Streisand...

Yessennia Swift said...

All are beautiful paintings! I don't know Him, but all his works are awesome!

Indiana Foundation Repair