In 1902, this is how Elizabeth Shippen Green illustrated moonlight:
Less than ten years later, her treatment of moonlight was far more accomplished:
How do we account for the great transformation of her work within a decade?
Green worked at the dawn of the 20th century, on the brink of many great changes:
- The art world was evolving: Green's beloved teacher and mentor, Howard Pyle, passed away along with other great classical illustrators such as Edwin Austin Abbey. Green had been a member of Pyle's first art class in 1894; she recalled, "he did not so much teach me how to draw but how to interpret life." Now a new generation was elbowing its way onto the stage. In the decade following 1902, Picasso and Braque invented cubism; Fauvism made its debut at the Paris salon; and Marinetti introduced his "Futurist Manifesto."
- Opportunities were changing dramatically for women illustrators: Previously, illustration had been almost exclusively a man's profession. In 1907, Green was among the very first women elected to the Society of Illustrators. She earned a long term contract with Harper's Magazine doing a higher quality of illustrations. As Green's biographer Alice Carter wrote, "The first generation of educated American women was becoming successful in a variety of careers, and their achievements were beginning to attract considerable attention."
- Color printing was undergoing a revolution: Green began her career drawing black and white illustrations with thick outlines. Look how her work changed as new technologies increased her powers.
Slowly, crude color was added:
Color became more accurate and subtle:
Finally, here are some details from the example I used at the start:
- Wrenching changes in Green's personal life: The changing role of women forced difficult decisions on Green. She had to choose between working as an artist or higher education at one of the colleges now available to women. Green, along with illustrators Violet Oakley and Jessie Wilcox Smith, stayed briefly at Bryn Mawr college where Green said she got her whole education sitting on the college lawn breathing in the knowledge left unabsorbed by the coeds.
Green lived on the brink of these great trends; she had to gamble, making choices before the outcome was clear. As we've seen, these changes in art, technology, relationships, and popular taste for illustration caused her great distress but didn't stop her art from improving.Most importantly, during this decade of change Green lived as one of the "red rose girls," three talented women illustrators who lived together in an intimate, loving relationship made possible by the new freedom for women. The three had vowed never to get married, but in 1911 Green broke her vow and left the group to marry a man. Her decision was agonizing for the entire group. Green was so torn by her choice, she prolonged her engagement, on and off, for 7 years.
We all live in times of change. Today we have uncertainty swirling all around us, from technological revolutions caused by AI to radical transformations in the audience for illustration. It remains to be seen if we navigate them as well as Green.
2 comments:
I love ESG; one of Pyle's best students. She had the drawing, imagination, color sense, pattern and texture, plus the craftsmanship. An amazing talent. One of the Crown Jewels in the Brandywine tradition, in my view.
Having said that, the first moonlight picture you posted is curiously terrible, also poorly printed. I don't know where you found it. I've never seen it. I don't think it is representative of her work overall or in 1902. (I wouldn't be surprised if it was something she did earlier on spec that later found publication because she had attained fame and standing.)
After all, one of my favorite ESG images is a moonlight image from the very same year as the poor one you posted at the top; 1902, March, Harper's: So haunted at moonlight with bat and owl...
Since I consider this spooky moonlight piece one of her masterworks, I'm disinclined to accept the rest of your narrative that begins with an inchoate ESG in 1902 inept at depicting Moonlight. (Pyle taught his students how to deal with various natural and artificial lighting situations, including moonlight.)
(fwiw, I don't like the second moonlight picture either. Clearly over-reliant on a reference photo and rather barren. The rest of the pictures are typical ESG greatness however.)
On another point, regarding ESG being "so torn" about getting married. She was torn about her husband-to-be being put in a position of being obligated to support her parents. Which she felt was her duty alone. Thus, as soon as her parents died, they were married. (Happily, they were well suited and had a grand time together.)
Kev Ferrara-- The picture I posted was an illustration from the same book as the picture you posted, "An Old Country House." by Richard Le Gallienne. Your picture is on p. 39 while mine can be found on p.93. I actually thought of using your "bat and owl" picture except it didn't actually show the moon. Besides, I thought my choice demonstrated an additional point, that the poor quality of printing in 1902 made it more difficult for illustrators to demonstrate their true worth.
If I was trying to skew the argument by picking lesser examples of ESG's work, it would not have been difficult to do, starting with the illustrations for A Very Small Person and extending all the way through the awful cover illustration for A May and November Correspondence.
I'm sorry you don't care for the second moonlight illustration. It was highlighted as an example of ESG's work in important reference works such as "200 Years of American Illustration" by Henry Pitz and "The Red Rose Girls" by Alice Carter. I could not find a better example of ESG's mature use of color when color printing finally began to mature-- a painting that, in my opinion, rivaled Maxfield Parrish's use of color. But it was also important to me that I had access to the original painting so I could show the best possible images here.
As for ESG's decision to marry, I'd urge you to take another look at Carter's excellent biography. Supporting her parents was the "official reason" she gave in order to fend off repeated proposals from her suitor for 7 years, but after her parents died "she... made no move to honor her promise to [her suitor]" until nearly a year later when he gave her an ultimatum: marry him now or the engagement was off. Carter has several well documented pages on the romantic relationship between the three women (and their "wife") that show what an excruciating choice it was for ESG. ("Blinking back her tears, Henrietta asked her friends, 'How can she love anyone more than she loves us?'"
Post a Comment